W3C: XHTML 2.0 working draft, August 5, 2002.

Changes from XHTML 1.1 are not specifically listed, but here’s what I’ve gathered so far:

Other interesting reading:

Point: Keep in mind that this is all just markupbation at this point. This is a working draft, now we’ll have lots of bickering, then we’ll have revisions, then we’ll have a final draft, then we’ll have one last round of bickering, then we’ll have a specification, then we’ll all sit around for two years waiting for Microsoft to implement it, then we’ll spend the rest of the decade complaining that they got it wrong.

Counter-point: Sjoerd Visscher: a working XHTML 2.0 page. Well, my fresh IE 5.5 install asks to download the page instead of displaying it, but it’s been giving me other shit, so maybe it’s just me. Lynx definitely asks me to download it. Looks great in Opera and Mozilla, though. That does it. I’m converting all my pages to XHTML 2.0. Accessibility be damned. Backward compatibility be damned. IE 5 be damned. (IE 5: the Netscape 4 of the new generation.)

§

Respond privately

I am no longer accepting public comments on this post, but you can use this form to contact me privately. (Your message will not be published.)



§

firehosecodeplanet

© 2001–9 Mark Pilgrim